When it comes to writing code, developers understand the importance of proper documentation. It not only helps in understanding the code better but also makes it easier for others to collaborate and maintain the codebase. One of the most widely used IDEs for Java development is IntelliJ, and it comes with a default javadoc comment format for classes. However, many developers have questioned why this format deviates from the standard syntax.
To understand the reasoning behind this, let's first take a look at what a javadoc comment is. In simple terms, it is a type of documentation that describes the purpose and functionality of a class, method, or field in Java. It follows a specific syntax that includes a description, parameters, return values, and exceptions.
In the case of IntelliJ, the default class javadoc comment follows a slightly different syntax. Instead of starting with the traditional "/**" and ending with "*/", it begins with "/** <p>" and ends with "</p>". This difference may seem insignificant, but it has caused confusion and debate among developers.
One of the main reasons for this non-standard syntax is the HTML formatting. IntelliJ allows developers to add HTML tags within the javadoc comments, which can be useful for creating more visually appealing and organized documentation. For example, the <p> tag is used to create a new paragraph, making the comment more readable.
Additionally, IntelliJ's javadoc comment format also includes a "see" tag, which is not part of the standard syntax. This tag allows developers to include links to other classes or methods, making it easier to navigate through the codebase.
However, despite the added benefits of HTML formatting and the "see" tag, this non-standard syntax has its drawbacks. One of the main concerns is that it may cause compatibility issues with other IDEs or tools that use the standard javadoc comment format. This can lead to confusion and errors when collaborating with other developers or working on a project that requires a specific format.
Another concern is that it goes against the principle of consistency. As developers, we strive to follow the industry's best practices, and using a different syntax for javadoc comments can be seen as deviating from those standards.
So, why does IntelliJ continue to use this non-standard syntax despite the concerns? The answer lies in the flexibility it offers to developers. By allowing HTML formatting and the "see" tag, IntelliJ gives developers the freedom to create more visually appealing and informative documentation. It also aligns with the IDE's overall focus on providing a user-friendly and customizable experience.
In conclusion, the default IntelliJ class javadoc comment uses non-standard syntax to provide developers with more flexibility and options for documentation. While it may have its drawbacks, it ultimately comes down to personal preference and the specific needs of a project. As long as the documentation is clear, consistent, and informative, the syntax used should not be a major concern.
