• Javascript
  • Python
  • Go

Why isn't the sizeof a struct equal to the sum of the sizeof of each member?

Structures, also known as structs, are an essential part of the C programming language. They allow programmers to create complex data types ...

Structures, also known as structs, are an essential part of the C programming language. They allow programmers to create complex data types by combining different primitive data types into a single unit. One common question that arises when working with structs is why the sizeof a struct is not equal to the sum of the sizeof of each member. In this article, we will explore the reasons behind this phenomenon.

First, let us understand what the sizeof operator does in C. The sizeof operator takes a data type as its argument and returns the size of that data type in bytes. For example, the sizeof(int) would return 4, as an integer data type is typically 4 bytes in size on most systems. Similarly, the sizeof(char) would return 1, as a char data type is 1 byte in size. This operator is useful when allocating memory for variables or when working with arrays.

Now, coming back to the question at hand, why isn't the sizeof a struct equal to the sum of the sizeof of each member? The answer lies in the concept of memory alignment. Memory alignment is the process of arranging data in a memory address in a way that is efficient for the system to access. Most modern computer systems use a concept called word alignment, where data is stored in multiples of the word size, which is typically 4 or 8 bytes. This means that if a data type is smaller than the word size, the system will still allocate a full word of memory for it.

When we create a struct, the compiler will automatically align the members of the struct according to the word size of the system. This means that if we have a struct with a char and an int member, the char will take up 1 byte, and the int will take up 4 bytes. However, the compiler will add padding bytes between the members to align them to the word size. In this case, the total size of the struct will be 8 bytes, instead of the expected 5 bytes (1 byte for char + 4 bytes for int).

Let us take a look at an example to better understand this. Consider the following code snippet:

struct example {

char c;

int i;

};

The sizeof(struct example) in this case would be 8 bytes, as explained above. However, if we were to sum the sizeof of each member, we would get 5 bytes (1 byte for char + 4 bytes for int). This difference of 3 bytes is due to the padding added by the compiler for memory alignment.

Now, you might wonder why the system needs to align data in the first place. The answer lies in the efficiency of memory access. When data is aligned, it can be accessed more quickly by the system, making the overall program run faster. If the data is not aligned, the system would need to perform extra operations to retrieve it, leading to slower performance.

In conclusion, the reason why the sizeof a struct is not equal to the sum of the sizeof of each member is due to memory alignment. The compiler adds padding bytes between the members to align them to the word size of the system, resulting in a larger size than expected. This concept is essential to understand when working with structs to avoid unexpected results and optimize the performance of your programs.

Related Articles

Overloading std::swap()

When it comes to programming in C++, there are a plethora of built-in functions and methods that can make our lives a lot easier. One such f...

Using pthread.h on Windows Build

Title: Using pthread.h on Windows Build Pthreads, which stands for POSIX Threads, is a standard thread API that is commonly used in Unix-bas...